jerv is also monosyllabic, so that is ruled out.
i suppose _to be_ is special....it is irregular in conjugation in every language I have ever seen...I suppose it would fit that it is irregular in pronounciation also.

I am wondering why _to be_ is so consistently irregular in conjugation....probably something obvious and me just being slow...i don't see why more regular usage directly leads to irregularity...if that was true then the articles would surely be really irregular....

definitely. Believe me, it is not all that exaggerated. And it fits the fact that the more level aereas have less variation.
As in the more level areas of Norway have less variation?
I never considered this before, but it does also explain why the US has very little variation for such a huge area..... That would suggest something interesting about the himalayas and such, but I know nothing about Tibetan...

it is indeed. VERY worrying. I mean, most people have trouble placing Norway on a map, and NOONE has heard of my town.
Well...i'm not too worried by the geography...when I was really small, I had a world map on the wall. Being small and stupid, I stared at it for periods of time too long for sanity. When I was 5, I could draw it from memory, and for some reason i didn't find it boring to do so every few days.
Then I got an atlas..... I think you get the idea. I ended up drawing out all the European maps into a book...no idea why since I had the atlas. I started with Scandinavia. So that explains that...
I do find it worrying though, how I knew the _Rosenes By_...I have never read a guide book or anything, and it wouldn't be in an atlas...well, i doubt it anyway..hm



~netweaver~