Did I say a single word about collusion? No. In fact, thus far, every time you've said 'Osama doesn't work with Saddam' I have made certain to point out that I've not presented that argument as either true or relevant. Feel free to deny the connection one more time, but it doesn't address an argument I've made.

as soon as it approaches coherence I will deign to respond

I said that Osama (and his ilk) blames the US for UN Sanctions on Iraq. Osama's follower's do the same. I presume that you understand that the fact that Osama hates Saddam does not force him to hate the people of Iraq.

so what? What does this then have to do with an argument on saddam? Just becaues some people think this way, doesn't mean it has much to do with saddam anda justification for removing him. Hell I'm drunk right now and I can still see that you r argument doesn't hold water

Osama's own words:

good for him. Like I could be bothered reading every link you put up, the majority biased

http://paulboutin.weblogger.com/2001/10/08

I believe that creating democracy in Iraq will help. You say 'destabilization' as if you intend that stability of evil tyrannies isn't a bad thing. You say 'Israel' as if I didn't list it as 1 of the 3 main sources of discontent that Osama bin Laden drew followers from. (just 2 posts ago wads...)

so every other country around there is evil? Nice to know that the world can be so black and white for you.

Goo night


wads

Onwards the Aussie Spam Invasion!
TwoWongs rocks my world
campaiging for vitamin S
Quai Master is my muffin